Met Council Meeting was a Waste of Time

March 12, 2013 at 7:41 pm 2 comments


By Andrew Richter

It’s not often that I think a public meeting is a complete waste of time. In fact, I’m such a political junkie that I can’t think of any public forum, debate, or meeting that I didn’t come away learning something.

That is until the night of March 7 when I attended the Met Council “public meeting” about Bottineau transit at Robbinsdale City Hall. This meeting was completely useless. There was no presentation, no opportunity to publicly address the issue, and there really wasn’t anything new to tell us. And of course, they hold the stupid thing at 5PM ensuring that most people can’t attend. Why can’t they hold it at 7??

The only real “news” that came out the night was the very quick appearance of my representation (and I use that word loosely) in Hennepin County…..good ol’ Mike Opat. Mr Opat was at the meeting at the very beginning. After talking to two people (one of whom told him she was against the light rail) he then up and left! Nice representation Mr. Opat! You advocate for light rail and ridicule anyone opposed to it, but when there is a public meeting that you can’t control you leave right away instead of standing there defending your actions. Of course, he made sure the TV cameras saw him there since he needs television to metabolize his food. What a stand up guy you are!!!

I wish I could get those two hours of my life back!

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Agenda 21, Brooklyn Park, City Government, Community, Crystal, Environment, Golden Valley, Hennepin, Robbinsdale, Transportation.

Yet Another Transit Tax Proposal Paid for by…. ALL OF US!!!! Report From the Met Council “Public Hearing”

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. numbersguy  |  March 12, 2013 at 8:14 pm

    I agree Andrew. It was a complete mis-direction to call it a “public meeting”.

    Reply
  • 2. wants2know  |  March 12, 2013 at 10:10 pm

    As one of the people who actually spoke to Mr. Opat, he was patronizing dismissive and imperialistic towards the 2 people who spoke with him. We were both opposed to this transit proposal. Clearly he is not representing his constituents which begs the question, who is he representing?
    I venture to say most of the taxpayers who were not government workers were opposed to this project for very good reasons.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Archives


%d bloggers like this: