Minnesota GreenStep’s Real Agenda Part 2

January 28, 2013 at 7:32 pm 3 comments


By Andrew Richter

OK folks, let’s continue out look at Minnesota’s Green Step Program (and notice this will have nothing to do with changing out light bulbs). Today we are going to look at Best Practice 11; a complete streets policy.

You notice roads unnecessarily being re-striped around here? You notice the adding of bike lanes a sidewalks? Well, it’s all part of a national and state plan called complete streets.

National Complete Streets Site

Minnesota Complete Streets

A complete street is defined “as roadways that enable safe and convenient access for all users, of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and personal, emergency and commercial vehicles and are conducive to efficient movement and mobility of people and goods.”

Best Practice number 11 under the Green Step Program calls for this under their first “tip”;

Adopt a complete streets policy that also addresses street trees and storm water.

Notice it doesn’t say “ask your citizens whether they want this or not.” No, the Green Step Program doesn’t care about that. And adopting a “policy” means that it will be implemented into the city’s comprehensive 2030 plan. Here is what a Complete Streets policy may look like;

Big Lake

New Hope

Here’s tip number 2;

Adopt zoning language or approve a development agreement for a selected area/project that is substantially equivalent to LEED for Neighborhood Development certification, including credits for Walkable Streets and Street Network.

Once again we see LEED being used as a standard. This is an effort to force us to obey international standards.

LEED Developmet Guide

How about this tip;

Implement traffic calming measures, including road diets and depaving, in at least one street redevelopment project.

Road diet? Are they eating too much…..no this is where they remove lanes for cars. A road diet is defined as converting an undivided 4-lane roadway with average daily traffic of 20,000 or less into 3 lanes made up of 2 through lanes and a center 2-way left turn lane.

Notice that happening?

Also they call for depaving roads???? And of course we need more roundabouts too!

Here are the so-called benefits to complete streets;

Improved safety for all users

Yeah right, I’ve personally had people use the center lane to pass me!!!!

Improved access for transit users, bicyclists and pedestrians

Why can’t they use sidewalks??

Increased walking, biking and thus community health

Why do we need to redo roads just so people can walk? What is preventing someone from walking? Can’t they walk in a park or on a side street?

The potential for a household to cut transportation costs by selling a car

Really? Well if everyone sold a car, who would then buy them? And didn’t we just spend billions of dollars to bail out car companies (or more accurately their unions)? We do that and then encourage people to sell their cars. That makes no sense.

Reduced emergency response times

So cutting out lanes for vehicles makes it easier for emergency vehicles to travel????

A healthy tree canopy and reduced and cheaper stormwater management

Huh?

More inviting public spaces and increased economic viability of businesses

You have to be joking. Last time I checked the viability of a business kinda depends on whether what they are selling is something people want to buy at a price people can afford. That damn capitalism!

Check out their summary;

The competitive advantage of cities – and a key distinction among cities, rural areas and many suburbs – is that city dwellers live and work in proximity to so many other people. Despite electronic networking, cities still thrive on proximity and daily physical interaction with a diverse group of people whose skills and abilities are mutually complementary. A well-designed, aesthetically appealing street network, that in its totality serves vehicles, walkers and bikers, facilitates social and economic interactions and a commitment to place, and delivers other benefits to a city and its people.

OK I defy anyone to tell me what that means.

Once again, what is the real agenda here; force us out of our cars by making driving as big of a bitch as humanly possible. This is also NOT economically conservative as some try to claim. What’s the cost of re-striping roads, building roundabouts, depaving roads, building trails and sidewalks, and so on and so forth?

And how does it makes sense in Minnesota???? Some cities have a longer snowmobile season then a biking season! No matter though, it’s good old one-size fits all Minnesota policy!

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Agenda 21, City Government, Environment, Hennepin, Met Council, Transportation.

Hidden Agendas… Part 3 The Major Overhaul of New Hope City Center is Going to Cost You

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Michael Libby  |  February 3, 2013 at 9:49 am

    Presumably, because we all get to vote, our city council doesn’t need to “ask [the] citizens whether they want this or not.” In effect, they did ask, it was called “the election”. That’s how representative government works, right?

    In Crystal, at least one candidate actively promoted the idea of GreenStep and was elected. Of course, her opponent also seemed in favor of the joining the program. But as far as I know, no one in southern Crystal made an issue of GreenStep or its practices, even though it (and the issues it touches on) was actively discussed.

    OK, maybe there were a few opponents of freedom who didn’t want you to be able to have chickens (which, coincidentally falls under GreenStep’s local food practices). But they didn’t manage to get their candidates past the primary.

    I think that the people of south Crystal have spoken, they believe in this type of thing and want Crystal to be a part of it. Further, most of the area believes the same thing, which is why Mike Freiberg and Ann Rest and Keith Ellison and Mike Opat and all the rest get elected and re-elected.

    Reply
  • 2. communitysolutionsmn  |  February 6, 2013 at 5:41 pm

    Give me a freaking break! South Crystal has spoken? I’d like to take a poll in southern Crystal and how many people can tell us ANYTHING about green step or even have any knowledge whatsoever about any of its best practices or proposed ordinances. What do you think……10%….5%….1%?

    If greenstep is the reason Friberg, Opat, Rest, and Ellison were elected or re-elected then why aren’t Minneapolis, Golden Valley, New Hope, Brooklyn Park, Osseo, Robbinsdale, and thankfully Crystal not part of Green step? Opat was first elected in 1992 and Rest in 1901…..excuse me 1984. Was green step the reason they were elected? Give me break its a DFL heavy area and you know it.

    Funny thing is…..if I had lived in section one….I probably would have voted for your wife but I would have done it in SPITE of green step NOT because of it.

    Reply
  • 3. communitysolutionsmn  |  February 6, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    By the way….I don’t think it’s good that most people don’t know about Green Step. I’d rather disagree with a person on principle then deal with people who are ignorant or don’t care.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Twitter Updates

Archives


%d bloggers like this: